A Question sent to me: regarding http://www.drudgereport.com 's implication that photographs were retouched.
Arnie, Can you tell if this photo is faked?
Look at the boy's hair and teeth. Maybe it's the angle of the
photo, but it does seem his hair is noticibly longer and he isn't
missing any teeth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I blew these photos up, and in the left photo with the camera
high, you are looking at a missing tooth in lower jaw. In right
photo, lower teeth are not visible at all.
Re hair, no, the photo doesn't appear to have been
retouched, would help to have the negatives, but doesn't appear
retouched, and consider this - a hot miami night, kid's been
sleeping, after playing all day, it is 6 AM, his hair looks
matted from need of a shower, and if you look closely his hair in
the front is brushed to his right, as if he wiped is hand over
his face upon awakening, making it appear shorter.
Now the nice Feds get him all cleaned up for his daddy shot... hair is 'fluffy', looks like more hair.
I'd prefer to die speaking my
mind than live fearing to speak.
The only thing that always works in scientology are its lawyers
The internet is the liberty tree of the 90's
http://www.lermanet.com - mentioned 4 January 2000 in
The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re
"Scientologist with no HEAD"