Banner lermanet2.com - Exposing the con | www.lermanet.com

Ex-Scientology OSA volunteer Tommy Gorman Interview (Warning adult language)

27 year member Creed Pearson tells his story
Yet Another Doubt Formula by a 25 year member
Michael Tilse

Ex-member Chuck Beatty's story

Ex-Sea Org Gary Weber's story

Dan Garvin's Story

Artist
Michael Pattinson
A New OT8, his story

Ex Sea Org
Michael Goldstien's Experiences

More Ex-member Stories and Audio Lectures including Tory Bezazian, now Tory Christman and D/Commodore Hana Eltringham, and Stacy Young

Through The Door - Still MORE Ex-member stories and a place you canw write yours RIGHT NOW

Dear Scientologist - A letter you can send to your scientology freinds (no "OT" materials)


Click on image for Hi-Resolution scan of Hubbard's Death Certificate



Click on image above for Hi-resolution scan of Hubbard's Toxicology Report


NEW!
Shannon Report
ponder these documents about Hubbard's real history

Ida's Promise
A mother's 27 year battle with Scientology after her son "Disconnected"

CBS 60minutes screenshot of logo before  show on Cult Awareness Network
Scientology's Takeover of the Cult Awareness Network - transcript and pictures from 60minutes


What Your Fees to Scientology really buy:
Private Investigators
Gagged Ex-members

Scientology's Scandals!




Support lermanet2.com




How to Get Involved








Links to information related to this article


Pattern of Lying to Smear ex-members and critics

Bugging of Auditing Rooms




Terminology FAQ Definitions for Scientology Lingo by ex-member Martin Hunt


About L Ron Hubbard's Death


Mysterious Death of L Ron Hubbard (links to LRH will, and autopsy)


Long time member Vaughn Young's 1st hand account, of Death of LRH


Chapter 4 of the book, A Piece of Blue Sky by ex-member Jon Atack about Hubbard's Death


Chapter 5 of the book, A Piece of Blue Sky After Hubbard


Bare Faced Messiah - Chapter 22 Missing, Presumed Dead


Time Track 1986


A Day at Gold Base with David Miscavige, by Jesse Prince


Deaths in Scientology


Why are they dead?


Quentin Hubbard Coroner Report, and background by Ex-Flag Cramming Officer Dennis Erlich


Secret Lives Transcript with images


Secrets Lives Transcript Text and link to Video


Scientology Litigant's, and activist Karin Spaink's L Ron Hubbard page


Fake war claims: Chris Owen's Ron The War "Hero"


Citizens Against Corruption's Complete Navy War record of L Ron Hubbard, summary and images of Naval record file


Legal Organization of Scientology Declaration Vaughn Young Sworn testmony for ex-member Lawrence Wollersheim


Use of PC File data against it's enemies Scientology Matrix article by Ex-member


Zegel Tape transcript Ex member gives details


Conspiracy for Silence Use of Gag Agreements as the cost of doing business


1982 Clearwater Commission hearings 1000 pages of SWORN testimony by many ex-members, including L Ron Hubbard's son by his first marriage Ron DeWolfe


REAL AUDIO file, Lecture by Ex-member David Mayo at his organization before it was destroyed by Hubbard, describes Scientology bragging about doing "a burglary every day" (LONG)


Spanish Criminal Indictment


IRS Secret IRS Agreement Newstories Actual Closing Agreement (Long)


Report from the day Hubbard invoked Religious Cloaking





Persecution of Ex-Members


Some of the Sources from which Hubbard molded Scientology


Hubbard the master Stage Hypnotist - What do kangaroos and body thetans have in common?


Why I dont trust Scientologists


What A Scientologist faces who wants to leave The Scientology Matrix


Scientology's Real Secret - the E-meter


Hubbard caught lying on video Secret Lives snippet




Scientology's Private Army of Private Investigators

Major News Articles of Interest to Ex-Members




Son of Scientology - An interview with Ron Dewolfe

Time Magazine




LA Times 6 Part Series




Pulitzer Prize Winnning 14 Part series in the St. Petersburg Times




Washington Post




New York Times




Wall Street Journal




Offlines.Org
A site by now ex-member Charlotte Kates

Warrior's Archive
Page by a co-worker I knew when I was 'in' scientology

The Very Strange Death of L Ron Hubbard the King of CONs

Through the Door:
Ex-member Interviews

Movies that a great for understanding Scientology:
The Truman Show 1998
The Sleuth 1972

Understanding OSA and the Guardians Office:
Cape Fear 1962

More for Scientologists

spacer

Why Sanity and Scientology are not related>

Editorial Note: Clarifications of Scientology nomenclature have been added in italic by Arnie Lerma. Those that require longer descriptions are footnoted. These as well as important keywords are hyperlinked to clarifying information

Not that credentials matter, but to get them out of the way, in a past decade I was a sr cs,(Senior Case Supervisor note 1) I audited OTS(Operating Thetans - Note2) in LA (Los Angeles) in other countries. I was considered a case cracker and did some special training/work under David Mayo for a brief time. Brief because he was canned. 

I have listened to LRH on tape countless times, and read the admin (administrative Note3) volumes, the tech volumes countless times, along with every book that was available to staff and public. I vaguely remember FN stats (Floating Needle Statistics Note 4) - my pcs FN'd my auditors pcs fnd. I have opinions on what that is but that is not my topic here. If anyone wants more I am happy to oblige with more.

Scientology has based it's entire premise on the idea of mental image pictures and thetans. Mental image pictures are what holds us back, along with those pesky BTS that are somehow not up to Thetan status.  What Scientology did calling mental image pictures "mental image pictures" is not new--Plato, Aristotle and countless other since have called them exactly the same thing. Yet, somehow it has been dubbed a new term that we must learn. Perhaps this is true if we consider the word as a contextual construct, a word that can be ahistorically, without intersubjectivity, i.e., an awareness how LRH texts relate to, borrow from or exist in the stream of written texts since antiquity.

What LRH has neglected to tell us, that so many philosophers have noticed and told us again and again, is that the creation of mental image pictures is natural. Yes, mental image pictures, like life, contain everything, the good, the bad and the ugly...but to get rid of them is a waste of time. If anyone has seen the movie Paycheck then it is obvious why. And it is not less knowledge of other philosophies one needs but more, because when I was in the church, thinking was really prohibited. The only reading we were supposed to do was reading of LRH materials. We cleared MUs until finally we got it, and we agreed. Interesting here is that thinking is closely tied to the creation of mental image pictures, at least in classical philosophy. Also, the imagination is driven by the creation of mental image pictures. SO, if thinking and the imagination and the creation of mental image pictures are related, why would Scientology want to eliminate them?

Sanity has nothing to do with deletion of the 'bank'. To delete the bank is to  delete the past, something the COS seems to enjoy doing even on the internet.

Sanity is not even a desired effect in a being. If anyone has read modern philosophers grappling with modernity, technology, etc, such as Nietzsche, Foucault, Bataille, Deleuze, and others, the tag of "normal" just means you are a drone. A happy drone does not rebel. A happy drone accepts the social order. Well, certainly, a social order exists in Scientology and if you go against it, how different is that from trangressing any other social order, such as the family, a church, a government? Trangression is how human beings advance, how change and creativity happen.

Words like happiness, freedom etc. do not mean what we think. Freedom is a difficult word that modern, still living philosophers such as Jean-Luc Nancy and others grapple with. Baudrillard has an incredible book called Passwords which touches upon Evil and freedom. If you read Passwords and think about Scientology, suddenly the impossibility of Scientology is made clear. The problem with Freedom is the problem of evil. Freedom when unrestricted implies the ability to transgress, to act individually. Obviously this is not the freedom Scientology proposes, is it? Isn't the freedom scientology proposes a freedom to be happy, a freedom from rather than to? But again, happy is also a difficult word. Nowadays people think of happy and think of having things...a nice car, a nice partner. Things make us happy. In scientology auditing is a very expensive thing that makes people happy. And this happiness comes at the hands of another, a priest as you will. Somehow in Scientology, one must get permission from another to FN, to be happy, to move onto the next level. And here is where Freedom and happiness, Scientology style, hold no appeal. Part of existence IS dread, IS suffering. And these things are not things to get rid of in order to achieve a kind of commercial or manufactured happiness of Scientology. NO.

What scientology wants to get rid of for us is experience. My answer to that is that all of experience IS experience and that to remove any of it, even the most terrifying is to remove what makes us human. To remove lower moods from the tone scale likewise makes us less than human.

The problem with "good" is that if one were every going to achieve it, some evil would have to happen. Something always comes at the expense of something else. To have a table you cut down a tree. To form a church you set "values" and automatically make a "Judgment" and thus assign as outside or "Other" any values that don't suit you. By its nature, the Good sets limits, wants to capture experience within a social order.

To be sane in a Scientology was is not desirable. To be sane in a way that allows for the full range of action, mobility, emotion would imply a kind of exterior position to any social order. Note that I did not say that in having this exterior position one would not be able to function in society...only that one would not be bound by or constrained by a social order.

Freedom is an individual process. To claim to be able to eliminate mental image pictures or the ability to create them is ridiculous because it's impossible. Mocking up, being creative is what people do. This is why no amount of auditing will ever clear anyone. Beings do what they do and mental image pictures are what they do. We love images. If anyone has doubt, read Society and the Spectacle by Debord. The problem is images is less their creation and more their use. Images are used by Scientology to sell. They use images to sell freedom, happiness and health. Images are used by Hollywood, by politicos. Images and the way the state uses them is an old problem. You can read Plato book X and find this covered.

So mental image pictures do not cause us ill health. It is how the images are used. It is how we misunderstand them. I would say that Scientology understands well how to use them to cause held down 7s...how to use them to cause guilty, desire, and any number of other human emotions.                                

Freedom is not something you get from paying for auditing. It is something you experience in the moment, on your own, alone as a human being. Social orders, religions....they don't provide this because they need compliance.

Even Christians have it wrong in a sense because they want to belong and in the desire for belonging to a group, forget that mediation through another human being limits their relationship with anything Divine. This problem is very well delineated by a philosopher named Kierkegaard in his book Fear and Trembling.

I am not implying that attaining community is wrong. I am not placing values here except to point out that any system that offers things like freedom, health, sanity, and happiness for a price or through a system or through the mediation of a priest or practitioner by that very fact becomes a system of exchange. Call it what you will: Master/slave, capitalism what have you. A price has to be paid.

And this is the point. To do, Good and Evil are always enterwined. To create a utopia where no one works and everyone floats around doing whatever they want requires a class system. There must be someone then, who does not enjoy utopia and who keeps the "machine" of it humming for the lucky ones. Good needs its henchment. Even in Plato's republic Book X, in the depictions of heaven we see the henchmen throwing people who won't make it into heaven.

Heaven is an exclusive club and you can only get there if you submit. You can only get there is you sacrifice. What you sacrifice could be another, could be yourself.

It always implies a rejection of something, a hatred of something.
So for this reason Scientology is filled with hate. It has its henchmen. It has borders. This is not tolerance, love and acceptance of human beings as they are and can be. This is telling us "You need to change to be better. You need auditing."

This is the lover who wants your soul but must rebuild you, must change you to make you suitable. To be involved with Scn is to be in a Sado-masochistic relationship. This is the gated community, bigotry, the us/them problem to the extreme. Scientology is filled with resentment, and in that sense "clearing" can never happen. The only "clearing" scientology does has to do with wiping out the individual, creating a tabula rasa or clean slate where they can then "write" what they like.

So Sanity and Scientology are not related. Scientology's version of Sanity is sanitized, wiped clean of the individual existence in order to satisfy the greater "good". Sadly, the greater good is not always the greater good. Many an important contributor to humanity was not understood in their time and yet contributed important things to the development of civilization. If they had not trangressed, if they had not acted anyway, where would we be?

I don't doubt that some claim benefits from Scientology. Some people need or want the very things this post would warn against. It is too frightening for some to conceive of thinking, or actually existing when existence itself is dreadful, filled with dread, filled with possibilities of harm...but possibility, not understanding is what should drive us. Understanding of the type Scientology offers is impossible. Kant, Hegel tried and failed. It's an effort to tie a bow on life and contain it.

Why would we want to contain life rather than to live??


Note 1: Each scientology organization has one person who is the overall authority on the use of Hubbard's technology, this one person reviews each auditors report and the persons folders and writes a directive to the auditor on what shall be done next, and questions to ask, and orders the auditor to corrective training when things do not go well. Case Supervisors are usually the most highly technically trained person in a Scientology Organization.


Here are some additional suggested sites to assist you:

http://www.clambake.org/archive/books/bfm/timeline.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~snefru/deathoflrh/FACTnet-death.html#protect
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/fun/index.html
http://www.robertdam-cos.dk/NOTs.html
http://www.freezone.org/reports/e_green.htm
http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/whatisscientology.htm




My Exit page for Scientologists and ex-members

Home | F.A.Q.'s | Legal | News | Search this site
| Contribute